Brew Dudes

Homebrewing Blog and Resource

The hobby of homebrewing beer

Cashmere, Calypso, & Mandarina Bavaria Hops IPA

In this post, we discuss Mike’s latest homebrewed IPA. It showcases the unique characteristics of three distinct hop varieties: Cashmere, Calypso, and Mandarina Bavaria. His goal was to explore how these hops contribute individually and collectively to the beer’s flavor profile. The video provides an overview of our brewing process and the insights we gained from this experiment.

3 Hops IPA Recipe

As Mike said, this is his “standard, sort of go-to IPA recipe” base.

Batch size: 3.5 US Gallons

Grain Bill:
6 pounds (2.72 kg) of Pilsner Malt
1 pound (0.45 kg) of White Wheat Malt
4 ounces (113 g) of CaraPils Malt
4 ounces (113 g) of Honey Malt

Hops:
0.36 ounces (10 g) Nugget hops added at 60 minutes to go in boil

0.36 ounces (10 g) Cashmere hops added at 10 minutes to go in the boil
0.36 ounces (10 g) Calypso hops added at 10 minutes to go in the boil
0.36 ounces (10 g) Mandarina Bavaria hops added at 10 minutes to go in the boil

0.64 ounces (18 g) Cashmere hops – Whirlpool addition at 180°F (82°C) for 20 minutes
0.64 ounces (18 g) Calypso hops – Whirlpool addition at 180°F (82°C) for 20 minutes
0.64 ounces (18 g) Mandarina Bavaria hops- Whirlpool addition at 180°F (82°C) for 20 minutes

1.0 oz (28 g) Cashmere hops – Dry hop addition for 3 days
1.0 oz (28 g) Calypso hops – Dry hop addition for 3 days
1.0 oz (28 g) Mandarina Bavaria hops – Dry hop addition for 3 days

Yeast:
1 packet of LalBrew Pomona Hybrid IPA Dry Yeast

Brewing Notes:
Mash at 145°F (63°C) for 40 minutes
Mash at 155°F (68°C) for 15 minutes
Mash at 168°F (76°C) for 15 minutes (Mash Out)
Boil for 60 minutes, following the hop schedule above
Cool wort to 68°F (20°C) and pitch yeast
Ferment at 68°F (20°C) for two weeks
Cold crash after primary fermentation
Dry hop for 3 days

Outcomes:
Original Gravity (OG): 1.066
Final Gravity (FG): 1.015
Estimated ABV: 6.69%

Our Tasting Notes

This IPA finished dry at 1.015 but drank even drier. It with a surprisingly soft mouthfeel. The combination of the malt bill and the Pomona yeast strain seemed to create a smooth, almost pillowy texture. It reminded Mike of a Kölsch. Certainly not in flavor, but how the beer sat on the palate. Fermentation was clean with a subtle ester profile. Overall, the beer came out well-attenuated and easy to drink.

This hop blend was chosen for its potential to showcase citrus and tropical fruit notes. What we actually got leaned more toward citrus pith and tangerine, especially from the Mandarina. The Calypso didn’t contribute much of its advertised pear or melon character. Mike talked about how hop flavor can shift over time. As varieties age or respond to different growing conditions, the flavor profile can change.

In this beer, the Pomona yeast didn’t deliver a bold fruit-forward punch. It offered something worth exploring further. Its impact on mouthfeel and fermentation performance was clear. We are curious how it would compare side-by-side with a more expressive strain. This was a solid, drinkable IPA with balanced bitterness and restrained hop character. It was not a fruit bomb, but something Mike would revisit with a few tweaks.

BREW ON!

Simcoe and Centennial Hops American Pale Ale

American Pale Ale With Simcoe & Centennial Hops

When you have a big bag of locally grown malt, you have to use it. Mike recently brewed up an American Pale Ale, and we’re excited to share the journey with you. This brew was one of the last ones Mike brewed following his cold weather, no chill brewing method this year. He aimed for a classic American Pale Ale profile that’s bright, hoppy, and refreshing. Let’s dive into the details of the recipe and our tasting experience.

Brewing the Simcoe & Centennial APA

Mike kept the grain bill straightforward, using Valley Malt Pale Malt and a touch of Munich to provide a solid backbone for the hops. The simplicity of the malt bill allows the hops to shine, which is exactly what we wanted. Here’s the recipe he followed:

Simcoe & Centennial American Pale Ale

Batch size: 3.5 US gallons

Grain Bill:

83% Valley Malt Pale Malt (~2°L)
17% Valley Malt Light Munich (~8°L)

Hops:
2 ounces of Simcoe hops at flameout
2 ounces of Centennial hops at flameout
1 ounce of Simcoe hops – dry hopped for 3 days at 45°F
1 ounce of Centennial hops – dry hopped for 3 days at 45°F

Yeast:
1 packet of LalBrew Nottingham English Ale Dry Yeast

 

Process:
Boil:
40-minute boil for gravity and sanitation

Mash Schedule:
40 minutes at 148°F for 
15 minutes at 168°F  (mash out)

Fermented at 20°C for two weeks.

Outcomes:

Original Gravity: 1.048
Final Gravity: 1.013
ABV: 4.6%

Tasting Notes

Right off the bat, the aroma was surprisingly fruity for a beer with hops added only at flameout and during dry hopping. We picked up notes of papaya, apricot, and clementine, along with a noticeable lemon rind character. That brightness worked well with the lightly malty backbone provided by the Munich malt.

 

The bitterness was balanced and restrained, which is interesting considering the no-chill approach and the full hop addition happening at flameout. Mike was looking to see how much flavor and bitterness could pull out without a traditional bittering charge and it worked. We likened it to a reverse first wort hopping technique, where hops are steeped at high temperature without a boil, preserving aroma without blowing out flavor.

 

Simcoe and Centennial ended up being a strong pairing. The Centennial provided citrus and orange peel notes, while Simcoe brought in subtle tropical tones without the overwhelming dankness we expected. The Nottingham yeast may have also contributed to some esters and biotransformation character that enhanced the overall fruitiness.

 

This was a solid APA that hit the mark in terms of flavor, balance, and drinkability. Mike is going to keep playing with this malt and hop combination to see where else it can go.

BREW ON!

Lager Yeast Showdown: W-34/70 vs. S-23 vs. S-189

In this video, Mike and I dive into a head-to-head-to-head taste test of three popular dry lager yeast strains: W-34/70, S-23, and S-189. All of them come from Fermentis, and we wanted to find out how different or similar they really are when brewed under the same conditions. This experiment came straight from a viewer request (cheers to that!), and we set it up to keep everything the same but the yeast so we could really focus on how each one performed.

The Brew Setup: Same Wort But 3 Yeast Strains

For this comparison, I brewed a single wort using American 2-row malt and a combination of Hallertauer and Loral hops for some noble hop flavor. I used spring water to keep the profile clean and neutral.

Here’s the homebrew recipe I followed:

Batch Size: 4 gallon boil; transferred into 3 one-gallon jugs

Water:
Spring water

Grain Bill:
100% American 2-Row Pale Malt

Hops:
1 ounce (28 g) of Hallertau hops (2.4%AA)
0.5 ounces (14 g) of Loral hops (10.5%AA) 30 minutes to go in the boil

Yeast:
Jug A: SafLager S-189
Jug B: SafLager W-34/70
Jug C: SafLager S-23
Yeast Amount: 3 grams per jug

Process:
Fermentation Temp: 65°F for one week
Lagering: 1 week in the fridge before tasting

We fermented all three beers at ale-like temps (65°F), which is totally doable with modern dry lager strains, especially W-34/70. The result? Fast fermentation, minimal off flavors, and beers that were ready to sample within two weeks.

The Results: Subtle Differences and a Clear Favorite

 So how did they taste? Honestly, we were surprised by how distinct each one turned out.
S-189 (Beer A) gave us a soft nose, doughy aroma, and clean malt character. It a yeast we would like to try again in a Baltic Porter or malty lager.
W-34/70 (Beer B), the crowd favorite, delivered the cleanest, most balanced beer. It really let the noble hop character shine and had the best drinkability. That’s probably why Mike keeps coming back to it in his own brewing. It just works.
S-23 (Beer C) had a stronger bite and a lingering aftertaste, likely due to its ester-friendly profile. I’d consider it for styles where a little extra complexity is welcome, maybe even a tropical stout fermented warm.

In the end, you can make great beer with any of these strains. Your choice may depend on what you’re aiming for. If you want reliable and clean, go W-34/70. If you want something a little more estery or malt-driven, S-23 or S-189 could be the ticket. Cheers to experimenting, learning, and brewing better beer.

BREW ON!

New Brew Dudes Feature – Hops Variety Table

Here is the moment you probably haven’t been waiting for. One never knows, though. We are happy to bring this new feature to you, since is have been a true labor of love, brewed slowly over the years. I’m talking about our new SMaSH Beer Table, which is now live on the site. If you’ve ever tried to remember what we said about a particular hop back in, say, 2015, now there’s a single place where all our SMaSH beer tasting notes live.

With some help of available computing power, dozens of hop variety reviews, SMaSH beer tasting impressions, style suggestions, and direct links to the original videos can be sorted and searched.

The resource for our hops reviews

From Competitions to Custom Hop Wisdom

You might notice that we quietly removed the old “Competitions” link from our site navigation. Honestly, I gave up trying to outdo the AHA or BJCP when it came to listing every homebrew contest out there years ago. Instead, we put our energy into something uniquely ours: hop analysis from real brews we made ourselves. For each hop, we brewed a small batch of SMaSH beer;  typically, 1 US gallon, using 2 pounds of pale malt and 1 ounce of the featured hop. We’d toss the hops in at different stages of the boil, ferment, package, taste, and talk. That’s what the new table captures. You’ll find what we thought (good or “meh”), what beer styles might benefit from each hop, and you’ll be able to sort by flavor notes, video link, or hop name.

A Decade of Hops Reviews – Organized

This has been a long time coming. Over the years, many of you wrote in asking for a summary, hoping for some way to make sense of the all the hop videos we’ve shared. Thanks to some clever AI help, we were able to compile all the key takeaways into one tidy, searchable resource. If you’re looking for a hop with big lime notes for your next hazy pale ale, or you want to avoid overly earthy flavors in your pilsner, this table will save you a lot of trial and error. Plus, if you just want to see what my hair looked like 10 years ago… well, the links are right there. Cheers to progress, to passion projects, and to pellet hops that still smell green.

Wai-iti Hops SMaSH Beer Tasting and Review

Hey! We’re back with another entry in our never-ending SMaSH (Single Malt and Single Hop) beer series. This time, we’re diving into a New Zealand variety that’s new to our lineup: Wai-iti hops.

I’ve stayed away from New Zealand hops for a while. Not because of the flavor, but because, frankly, I struggle to pronounce their names. But we are back to drink beer and say it wrong.

Wai-iti brings some interesting lineage to the table, with Liberty and Hallertau in its parentage. It’s a lower-alpha variety, so we were curious how it would hold up in our standard testing format.

Well, we tried to say the name right.

Brew Day Details

For this SMaSH beer, we followed our usual method: a one-gallon batch with two pounds of grain and two gallons of water. Here’s the hop schedule we used:

Wai-iti Hops SMaSH Beer Recipe

Grain Bill: 2 pounds of Pale Malt
Water Volume: 2 gallons
Boil Time: 60 minutes

Hop Schedule:
7 grams at 60 minutes
14 grams whirlpool additions at 180 °F (82°C) for 10 mintues
7 grams dry hop for 1 day post-fermentation

Fermentation: 7 days at room temperature

Cold Crash: 1 day

Yeast: US-05

These hop pellets came from Yakima Valley Hops’ 2024 crop and clocked in at just 3% alpha acids. We gave it a bit of a push to coax out as much bitterness as possible.

What Is Wai-iti All About?

Right from the pour, the aroma was punchy, fruit-forward, and lively. We picked up Juicy Fruit notes before we even brought the glass to our noses. There were definite hints of green melon, cantaloupe, and a bit of citrus zest. What stood out to me was a subtle creamy vanilla vibe, which made the whole experience really pleasant and slightly unexpected. Mike mentioned lime zest and even a bit of a “zippy” bitterness, which was more noticeable than in many of our recent SMaSH tests.

Wai-iti isn’t resinous or dank; instead, it brings a clean bitterness and a bright, fruity profile. I could totally see this being a standout hop in a cream ale, a wheat beer, or even a blend with something like Simcoe or Citra to boost fruit character in the late additions. It’s a hop that pulls its weight in aroma, flavor, and clean bitterness

So if you’re looking for something refreshing and a bit unique for your next brew, Wai-iti might be worth tossing into the boil.

BREW ON!

Page 5 of 313