Brew Dudes Homebrewing Blog

Sour Beer Miracle – Rejuvenation With Cherries

On May 22, 2024

If you have been watching our videos for a while, you may have noticed a beer in a carboy on Mike’s left. It’s been sitting there for years. People have asked about it. We have evaded the questions. Finally, we have an answer.

Some things are worth the wait, especially a sour beer miracle.

Discover how Mike rescued a sour beer by adding a blend of sweet and tart cherries, lactose, and cherry flavor extract. The result? A refreshing and natural fruit-flavored beer with some hints of what brettanomyces left behind.

We can save this beer!

The Rescue Plan

Mike’s plan was simple yet effective. He used a combination of techniques to add some sweetness, fruit character, and depth to his golden sour ale. Here’s a breakdown of his cherry rescue mission:

Fruity Infusion: First up – frozen cherries. He thawed them out and gave them a good mashing to release all their flavor. A gentle heating helped break them down even further before they were incorporated into the beer.

A Little Lactose: To counteract the inherent sourness of the aged beer, he added lactose sugar. This addition not only adds a touch of sweetness but also added body and produced a smoother mouthfeel.

The Cherry (Extract) on Top: For an extra cherry punch, he included a small amount of cherry flavor extract. This addition guaranteed a recognizable cherry presence without overpowering the natural flavors from the mashed fruit.

After combining all the elements, he let the concoction sit for a few days to allow the flavors to meld. Then, then it was time to taste.

Sour Beer Miracle Thoughts

So, how did this sour ale rejuvenation turn out? I think we are satisfied with the results. The final product is a delightful sour cherry ale. The tartness and the brett character from the base beer are subdued by the burst of cherry flavor.

I am not sure if the lactose brings noticeable sweetness but its effect on the body is a big part of the miracle. Overall, the beer had a wonderful depth of character, thanks to the Brett fermentation and the long aging process.

The sour beer miracle is a testament to the power of creativity and resourcefulness in homebrewing. So next time you have a neglected brew lurking in the back of your fridge, don’t give up on it! With a little ingenuity and some fresh ingredients, you might just discover a hidden gem.

Cheers and BREW ON!

Pink Hops SMaSH Review and Tasting

By John Krochune

On May 15, 2024

In Hops, Videos

These Brew Dudes are always excited to experiment with new hops, and our latest adventure involves brewing a SMaSH (Single Malt and Single Hop) beer using Pink Hops, an experimental variety that we bought from Yakama Valley Hops. Despite its name, this hop isn’t pink at all—it’s green like the rest. Apologies for the bad joke – here’s the video:

The Brewing Process

Our brewing process for this SMaSH beer is the similar to our other hops explorations. We used a 1-gallon batch size, incorporating two pounds of grain and a single packet of hops. The yeast of choice was US-05 and we fermented the beer at room temperature. For packaging, we used the Carbonation Cap to get the final product ready for the video.

We followed this hop schedule: a pinch of hops at the 60-minutes to go in the boil, another addition at 20 minutes, a whirlpool addition, and a final round of dry hopping. This method ensured that we could capture the full range of flavors offered by Pink Hops.

Our Pink Hops Thoughts

Originating from Jackson Farms in Wilder, Idaho, the same folks who brought us Idaho 7, these hops offer a distinctive and intriguing profile. The bitterness was pronounced, described as pithy, danky, and resiny, lingering on the palate.

The flavor profile was hard to pin down, with hints of chive, green pepper, and a surprising note reminiscent of Swedish fish candy. The aroma carried nondescript red fruit scents, blending into an artificial sweetness.

As we tasted, we noted dynamic elements: geranium, cut grass, and even a hint of vanilla frosting. These complex and sometimes conflicting descriptors made Pink Hops hard to pin down.

In conclusion, brewing with Pink Hops was a fascinating experience that highlighted the hop’s potential for diverse flavor contributions. While its high alpha acids suggest it could shine in a West Coast IPA, its unique fruity and floral notes also make it a great candidate for fruit beers.

Check out Pink Hops when you get a chance – BREW ON!

Base Malt Comparison – Mecca Grade vs. Standard

By John Krochune

On May 8, 2024

In Experiments, Malts, Videos

A few years ago, we got a request to investigate the quality of malts from smaller outlets. In the message, the writer wondered if malts grown and malted by smaller, craft-focused companies were worth the higher price per pound. In this post, we finally present our comparison between two base malts: Mecca Grade Estate’s Lamonta Pale Malt and Rahr’s Standard 2-Row Malt. Through a designed experiment, we aim to present our thoughts on the differences and ascertain whether the premium associated with Mecca Grade malt is justified.

They look pretty similar – how do they taste?

How We Set Up The Comparison

The experiment has a clear objective: to understand the difference of these two base malts on the flavor of the final product. We brewed 2 identical batches of beer, maintaining uniformity in all aspects except for the base malt. One batch featured Rahr Two-Row Pale Malt sourced from BSG, while the other employed Mecca Grade Lamonta American Pale Malt bought from Northern Brewer. From recipe formulation to hop selection (Cascade), water composition (Spring water with a touch of Gypsum), and yeast strain (US-05), every parameter remained consistent across both brews.

Our Thoughts

Mike was given a blind triangle taste test. We wanted to know if he could detect pick out the difference. He correctly identified the beers by their base malt (Phew!) While the Mecca Grade malt exhibited subtle variations, offering a slightly richer and smoother profile compared to its counterpart, we didn’t think these differences justify a higher cost. Indeed, Mike picked out the nuances, but they were so delicate that they might be overshadowed in a more complex grain bill.

I think we got our answer. While premium malts may promise distinctiveness, the benefits in a practical brewing context remain subjective. Ultimately, the pursuit of crafting excellent beers isn’t just in the ingredients themselves but in the execution of the brewing process.

Hey, Buy what you want and have fun!

BREW ON!

American Light Lager Research

By John Krochune

On May 2, 2024

In Style Profiles, Videos

Mike has the beer style he needs to learn more about as a result of the Jar of Destiny Pick 10. This video shows how he pulled me into his American Light Lager Research. In it, we taste 5 beers in a row and try to figure out the best aspects of this style. It’s not everyone’s favorite, but it is a challenge to brew a good one at home. Here’s the labor of love in video form.

Force me to drink Bud Light, huh?

The Research Set Up

After a run to the store, Mike poured 5 beers for us to taste. I didn’t see what he poured so it was a blind taste test for me. For better evaluation purposes, he left the beers out of the fridge so they could warm up. Ice cold beer makes it hard to decipher flavor notes so we sacrificed a bit of the enjoyment for our collective understanding.

Once the beers were pours and the camera was rolling, it was on to the tasting.

Our Thoughts

Here’s our breakdown of each of the beers:

Night Shift Nite Lite
We think this beer has the most flavor and body. It might be because it is adjunct-free, whereas most other light lagers use rice or corn syrup.
Coors Light
This beer came off as unremarkable. Mike says that it likely has corn syrup as an adjunct.
Bud Light
We found this beer to be the lightest, most crisp, and cleanest tasting. Mike states that Bud Light may have a hint of apple in its flavor.
Miller Lite
This beer is Mike’s go-to summer beer. It has the strongest aroma with ester-y notes that are not in the other beers
Pabst Blue Ribbon
This beer has bigger body and taste as compared to the other beers. We know Pabst Blue Ribbon isn’t considered a light lager, but Mike wanted to a curveball for comparison.

The big thing Mike got out of this research is the need for adjunct and possibly enzymes to drive the final gravity down to get the light, crisp profile. I am looking forward to the results.

BREW ON!

WLP001 vs. US-05 Dry Yeast Comparison

By John Krochune

On April 24, 2024

In Experiments, Videos, Yeast

We love brewing for The Dash. This time, we present a comparison between two dry beer yeasts. White Labs WLP001 has been available in liquid form but now you can get it in the dry format too. We brewed two beers from the same wort to note the differences between dry WLP001 and Safale US-05 and bring our thoughts to you.

The Experiment Details

Our experiment began with the careful crafting of a classic American Pale Ale. Utilizing a recipe featuring 92% Rahr 2-Row Pale malt and 8% Crystal malt for color and character, we controlled every aspect of the brewing process. From the water source (pure spring water with no additives) to the hop additions (Cascade Hops at 60 and 15 minutes and flameout), we ensured a consistent foundation for our yeast comparison. rewed one batch of wort and split it between two fermentors. Each fermentor was inoculated with a separate yeast strain so we could compare them.

Heading 2

With the wort prepared, it was time to introduce our yeast contenders. Splitting the batch into two fermentors, one received WLP001 while the other was inoculated with US-05. After fermentation, a blind taste test with Mike so he could give his feedback on aroma, taste, and overall impressions.

Mike’s reactions were illuminating. While both beers exhibited the main notes of the American Pale Ale recipe, it was clear that each yeast strain imparted its own unique profile. The beer fermented with WLP001 showcased a subtle maltiness with hints of peach, while the one brewed with US-05 boasted a pronounced hop aroma and cleaner finish.

Our WLP001 vs. US-05 Conclusions

With the differences we encountered with WLP001 and US-05, our preference for our SMaSH beer series will continue to be US-05. This strain appeared to present stronger hop aroma and flavor. In addition, the cheaper price point makes it more affordable as well. However, your choice of yeast ultimately depends on factors such as beer style and personal preference.

BREW ON!