<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Primary Fermentation</title>
	<link>http://www.brew-dudes.com/primary-fermentation/121</link>
	<description>Resource for home brewers created by home brewers.</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 22:03:38 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.brew-dudes.com/primary-fermentation/121#comment-37586</link>
		<author>John</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 18:01:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.brew-dudes.com/primary-fermentation/121#comment-37586</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Sean,  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Mike has left beer in the primary for a month due to timing conflicts and didn't have any trouble.  Although not best practice, you should be ok with 3 weeks in the primary.  Just bottle it up when you get back to town and let it sit in the bottle for two weeks before cracking one or many open.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Sean,  </p>
<p>Mike has left beer in the primary for a month due to timing conflicts and didn&#8217;t have any trouble.  Although not best practice, you should be ok with 3 weeks in the primary.  Just bottle it up when you get back to town and let it sit in the bottle for two weeks before cracking one or many open.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean</title>
		<link>http://www.brew-dudes.com/primary-fermentation/121#comment-37582</link>
		<author>Sean</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 16:10:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.brew-dudes.com/primary-fermentation/121#comment-37582</guid>
		<description>i am brewing my first batch of beer, an IPA.    my question is, can i leave it in the primary fermenter for 3 weeks before bottling?  the instructions said i should leave it in primary fermentation for 2 weeks and secondary for 2 weeks, but i don't have a secondary fermenter, so i am planning to skip that step.  I'm heading out of town so bottling isn't much of an option right now.  are there any adverse effects to leaving it in the primary fermenter with the fermentation lock for 3 weeks before bottling???  Thanks guys, this site is great.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i am brewing my first batch of beer, an IPA.    my question is, can i leave it in the primary fermenter for 3 weeks before bottling?  the instructions said i should leave it in primary fermentation for 2 weeks and secondary for 2 weeks, but i don&#8217;t have a secondary fermenter, so i am planning to skip that step.  I&#8217;m heading out of town so bottling isn&#8217;t much of an option right now.  are there any adverse effects to leaving it in the primary fermenter with the fermentation lock for 3 weeks before bottling???  Thanks guys, this site is great.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bobby</title>
		<link>http://www.brew-dudes.com/primary-fermentation/121#comment-37500</link>
		<author>Bobby</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 18:01:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.brew-dudes.com/primary-fermentation/121#comment-37500</guid>
		<description>Will do, and thanks so much. Love the forum, very helpful in other matters not relating to this particular one. Appreciate it!

Bobby</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Will do, and thanks so much. Love the forum, very helpful in other matters not relating to this particular one. Appreciate it!</p>
<p>Bobby</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.brew-dudes.com/primary-fermentation/121#comment-37491</link>
		<author>John</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 16:47:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.brew-dudes.com/primary-fermentation/121#comment-37491</guid>
		<description>Hi Bobby,

I deleted the older comments from you because I thought your most recent one summed up your story best.  We have it set so that first time comments need to be approved by us to be published.  The delay in us approving it probably caused the confusion.

Anyway,  I don't think your batch is dead.  I think the honey definitely got the yeast activity up in those first two days.  I think if things are calmer now, that is ok.  I know when I brewed with honey, the first two days of fermentation were incredibly vigorous.  It sounds like everything is going fine.

 I would leave your batch in your fermenter for 2 weeks and bottle it up (I am guessing that you rack to bottles).  Let the beer condition at the same temperature for 2 weeks and it should be carbed up and ready when you see your friend.     

We salute you for supporting the troops this way.   The beer will probably be really dry tasting...lacking sweetness but will probably will be really drinkable as well.  

Let us know how it turned out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Bobby,</p>
<p>I deleted the older comments from you because I thought your most recent one summed up your story best.  We have it set so that first time comments need to be approved by us to be published.  The delay in us approving it probably caused the confusion.</p>
<p>Anyway,  I don&#8217;t think your batch is dead.  I think the honey definitely got the yeast activity up in those first two days.  I think if things are calmer now, that is ok.  I know when I brewed with honey, the first two days of fermentation were incredibly vigorous.  It sounds like everything is going fine.</p>
<p> I would leave your batch in your fermenter for 2 weeks and bottle it up (I am guessing that you rack to bottles).  Let the beer condition at the same temperature for 2 weeks and it should be carbed up and ready when you see your friend.     </p>
<p>We salute you for supporting the troops this way.   The beer will probably be really dry tasting&#8230;lacking sweetness but will probably will be really drinkable as well.  </p>
<p>Let us know how it turned out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bobby</title>
		<link>http://www.brew-dudes.com/primary-fermentation/121#comment-37487</link>
		<author>Bobby</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 15:26:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.brew-dudes.com/primary-fermentation/121#comment-37487</guid>
		<description>Hi guys,

I thought I posted this last night but it looks like it didnt click. I have kind of a long story. I apologize if this gets posted twice.

I recently found out that my best friend is coming home from Iraq in 3 weeks. I live out of state and can make it home to see him in 4. I found out that he hasn't had a beer in 4 months, so I decided to make an emergency welcome home batch for him, but hes only home for 2 weeks. SO... I decided that since I know the guy pretty well, potency and taste could offset any inadequate carbonation. This is only my 3rd batch in all, and I started doing some research to try and up the potency faster, and get a batch pounded out in 4.

The problem? My solution was to add a pound of raw honey to the boil to give the yeast some extra food, and I used a local brew shop recommended yeast that is apparently faster fermenting than the standard stuff I have been using. In my newbishness I didn't realize that adding the honey would create a higher SG and therefore require more time both fermenting and conditioning despite the faster active yeast, at least I've been told. Within an hour of pitching the yeast I started seeing results, and by the next day I had a CRAZY amount of activity. The temperature even went as high as 74+ on my fermometer and I cooled the carboy down to 64 to keep it from overheating. My apartment is kept at 65 degrees so it was definitely not room temperature. After I cooled it down I returned it to it's resting place, and by the end of the night (second day in primary fermentor) the activity was barely noticeable and I was only getting about 1 bubble a minute in the airlock. The temperature had stabilized to about 66-68 degrees, but the falloff of activity is scaring me. My first two batches slowed in activity after about 3-4 days and were ready to rack by the 8-9th. I figured since I added the honey it should be going for awhile, despite the faster acting yeast. 

I am prepared to let it sit for a week or two and just deal with it as I have to. But am I being too worried? Did I kill off the yeast by cooling it down? I thought that what I was supposed to do. I realize that this may not be ready for my friend, but I would hate to have stillborn batch, if you'll pardon the expression. I was very sanitary, and the smell coming from the airlock is that of a delicious modified pale ale, so I don't think the yeast ruptured and died or were out-competed by some nasty microbes.

Any words of wisdom to help a confused newbie out would be much appreciated.

Thanks, and sorry for the novel!

Bobby</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi guys,</p>
<p>I thought I posted this last night but it looks like it didnt click. I have kind of a long story. I apologize if this gets posted twice.</p>
<p>I recently found out that my best friend is coming home from Iraq in 3 weeks. I live out of state and can make it home to see him in 4. I found out that he hasn&#8217;t had a beer in 4 months, so I decided to make an emergency welcome home batch for him, but hes only home for 2 weeks. SO&#8230; I decided that since I know the guy pretty well, potency and taste could offset any inadequate carbonation. This is only my 3rd batch in all, and I started doing some research to try and up the potency faster, and get a batch pounded out in 4.</p>
<p>The problem? My solution was to add a pound of raw honey to the boil to give the yeast some extra food, and I used a local brew shop recommended yeast that is apparently faster fermenting than the standard stuff I have been using. In my newbishness I didn&#8217;t realize that adding the honey would create a higher SG and therefore require more time both fermenting and conditioning despite the faster active yeast, at least I&#8217;ve been told. Within an hour of pitching the yeast I started seeing results, and by the next day I had a CRAZY amount of activity. The temperature even went as high as 74+ on my fermometer and I cooled the carboy down to 64 to keep it from overheating. My apartment is kept at 65 degrees so it was definitely not room temperature. After I cooled it down I returned it to it&#8217;s resting place, and by the end of the night (second day in primary fermentor) the activity was barely noticeable and I was only getting about 1 bubble a minute in the airlock. The temperature had stabilized to about 66-68 degrees, but the falloff of activity is scaring me. My first two batches slowed in activity after about 3-4 days and were ready to rack by the 8-9th. I figured since I added the honey it should be going for awhile, despite the faster acting yeast. </p>
<p>I am prepared to let it sit for a week or two and just deal with it as I have to. But am I being too worried? Did I kill off the yeast by cooling it down? I thought that what I was supposed to do. I realize that this may not be ready for my friend, but I would hate to have stillborn batch, if you&#8217;ll pardon the expression. I was very sanitary, and the smell coming from the airlock is that of a delicious modified pale ale, so I don&#8217;t think the yeast ruptured and died or were out-competed by some nasty microbes.</p>
<p>Any words of wisdom to help a confused newbie out would be much appreciated.</p>
<p>Thanks, and sorry for the novel!</p>
<p>Bobby</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Woody</title>
		<link>http://www.brew-dudes.com/primary-fermentation/121#comment-37434</link>
		<author>Woody</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 01:26:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.brew-dudes.com/primary-fermentation/121#comment-37434</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the feedback.

I took the SG, it was 1.01 or very close.  Seems fast for only coooking since Sunday.  This was from a sample batch I took before I put the airlock on originally.  (The sample was put in a 12 oz bottle with a paper towel as a stopper and the sample sat touching the primary carboy.)   The airlock is down to one bubble each 90-100 seconds.  Temp is 63 - 66.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the feedback.</p>
<p>I took the SG, it was 1.01 or very close.  Seems fast for only coooking since Sunday.  This was from a sample batch I took before I put the airlock on originally.  (The sample was put in a 12 oz bottle with a paper towel as a stopper and the sample sat touching the primary carboy.)   The airlock is down to one bubble each 90-100 seconds.  Temp is 63 - 66.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.brew-dudes.com/primary-fermentation/121#comment-37393</link>
		<author>Mike</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 14:00:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.brew-dudes.com/primary-fermentation/121#comment-37393</guid>
		<description>Woody
Congrats on getting started.  Everything sounds normal to me with your first brew.  As a rule I always go two weeks in primary before doing anything.  I think with this beer you made that would serve you well too.  Remember this, bubbling is never a good indication of fermentation activity towards the end.  Always rely on gravity checks.  Just because the bubbling slows or stops after 5 days it doesn't mean the yeast are done or not doing something important.
You temps sound spot on for your first batch too.
BREW ON!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Woody<br />
Congrats on getting started.  Everything sounds normal to me with your first brew.  As a rule I always go two weeks in primary before doing anything.  I think with this beer you made that would serve you well too.  Remember this, bubbling is never a good indication of fermentation activity towards the end.  Always rely on gravity checks.  Just because the bubbling slows or stops after 5 days it doesn&#8217;t mean the yeast are done or not doing something important.<br />
You temps sound spot on for your first batch too.<br />
BREW ON!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Woody</title>
		<link>http://www.brew-dudes.com/primary-fermentation/121#comment-37364</link>
		<author>Woody</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 05:07:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.brew-dudes.com/primary-fermentation/121#comment-37364</guid>
		<description>My first home brew attempt, started on Sunday. English Pale Ale (Brewers Best kit).  Everything went well in the kitchen, when finished the SG was 1.042, right where it was suppose to be.  Put it in a glass carboy, within 6 hours it was bubbling.  All day the next day (Monday), bubbled every 3-4 seconds, now (Tuesday) bubbling 1 every 15 seconds.  Is this normal?  The foam only got to about 1-2 inches off the surface.

The fish tank thermometer read 72 the first day, now down to 66-68.  The thermometer  near the tank never got higher then 69ish.  

So....
- Just ride it out until it completely stops bubbling, then move to secondary?
- Let it ride in the primary for two weeks?
- When it stops bubbling, bottle it?

Directions say to wait a week in primary, then move to secondary.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My first home brew attempt, started on Sunday. English Pale Ale (Brewers Best kit).  Everything went well in the kitchen, when finished the SG was 1.042, right where it was suppose to be.  Put it in a glass carboy, within 6 hours it was bubbling.  All day the next day (Monday), bubbled every 3-4 seconds, now (Tuesday) bubbling 1 every 15 seconds.  Is this normal?  The foam only got to about 1-2 inches off the surface.</p>
<p>The fish tank thermometer read 72 the first day, now down to 66-68.  The thermometer  near the tank never got higher then 69ish.  </p>
<p>So&#8230;.<br />
- Just ride it out until it completely stops bubbling, then move to secondary?<br />
- Let it ride in the primary for two weeks?<br />
- When it stops bubbling, bottle it?</p>
<p>Directions say to wait a week in primary, then move to secondary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.brew-dudes.com/primary-fermentation/121#comment-31764</link>
		<author>John</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 02:31:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.brew-dudes.com/primary-fermentation/121#comment-31764</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Henry.  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Grolsch style bottles should work just fine.  Actually, they are somewhat coveted by homebrewers because they are easier to cap than the crimp style bottles.  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;As long as the rubber seals are in place and are in good condition, you should be able to bottle up your beer with no problems at all.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Henry.  </p>
<p>The Grolsch style bottles should work just fine.  Actually, they are somewhat coveted by homebrewers because they are easier to cap than the crimp style bottles.  </p>
<p>As long as the rubber seals are in place and are in good condition, you should be able to bottle up your beer with no problems at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Henry</title>
		<link>http://www.brew-dudes.com/primary-fermentation/121#comment-31502</link>
		<author>Henry</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jan 2010 18:01:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.brew-dudes.com/primary-fermentation/121#comment-31502</guid>
		<description>Hey guys,  I'm going to bottle my first batch of Pale Ale this weekend and will bottle in 16 OZ bottles with Grolsh style lock caps with seals. Will this work OK or will crimp caps be better?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey guys,  I&#8217;m going to bottle my first batch of Pale Ale this weekend and will bottle in 16 OZ bottles with Grolsh style lock caps with seals. Will this work OK or will crimp caps be better?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
