<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Chinook Hops</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.brew-dudes.com/chinook-hops/251/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.brew-dudes.com/chinook-hops/251</link>
	<description>Resource for home brewers created by home brewers.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 07:29:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: overcarbed.com - your homebrewing and beer destination</title>
		<link>http://www.brew-dudes.com/chinook-hops/251#comment-6949</link>
		<dc:creator>overcarbed.com - your homebrewing and beer destination</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 16:22:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brew-dudes.com/chinook-hops/251#comment-6949</guid>
		<description>[...] #1 was brewed with 120 pounds of fresh centennial hops, and #2 was brewed with 120 pounds of fresh chinook hops.  both were great, but completely different &#8211; CB preferred the centennial, while I [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] #1 was brewed with 120 pounds of fresh centennial hops, and #2 was brewed with 120 pounds of fresh chinook hops.  both were great, but completely different &#8211; CB preferred the centennial, while I [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Galena Hops &#124; Brew Dudes</title>
		<link>http://www.brew-dudes.com/chinook-hops/251#comment-6948</link>
		<dc:creator>Galena Hops &#124; Brew Dudes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 11:25:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brew-dudes.com/chinook-hops/251#comment-6948</guid>
		<description>[...] Chinook Hops [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Chinook Hops [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay</title>
		<link>http://www.brew-dudes.com/chinook-hops/251#comment-6947</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2008 01:23:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brew-dudes.com/chinook-hops/251#comment-6947</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve had the Arrogant Bastard Ale..in fact, i own the neon clock too..lol

Good brew..and yes the aroma of the hops are present..tho not strong like your heavier IPA&#039;s

Anyhow..would agree would work in Porters and Stouts too, tho one would have to be careful not to offset the over point of these styles.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve had the Arrogant Bastard Ale..in fact, i own the neon clock too..lol</p>
<p>Good brew..and yes the aroma of the hops are present..tho not strong like your heavier IPA&#8217;s</p>
<p>Anyhow..would agree would work in Porters and Stouts too, tho one would have to be careful not to offset the over point of these styles.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

